Modzilla firefox vs waterfox12/9/2023 ![]() So, on top of weighing complicated antitrust questions, Mehta might also struggle to keep track of basic facts like how search was conducted at any given point in the case's timeline. During the more than 10-year time period that the case covers, browsers, phones, and search engines all evolved rapidly. It's unclear if Cavanaugh's arguments were persuasive or if Google's lawyer, John Schmidtlein, was more successful in convincing Mehta that Google had no contract with Microsoft and thus no "duty to deal."įor Mehta, wading through these arguments requires a decent knowledge of tech history. According to Cavanaugh, Google had a "duty to deal" with Microsoft and integrate Bing ads into SA 360, but after choosing to work with Microsoft, Google delayed implementing Bing ads-simply motivated as an alleged monopolist to diminish a competitor. William Cavanaugh, a lawyer representing the state of Colorado, also appeared to raise one unique claim still being weighed in this case regarding Google's search engine marketing (SEM) tool SA 360. Mehta asked Dintzer to clarify a few points so he could understand how long Google has been illegally maintaining monopoly power (more than a decade, the DOJ said) and how much of Google's search traffic comes from being set as the default (50 percent). The gist of the DOJ's position is that Google regularly blocked search competitors and prevented innovations that could have made searching the web "faster, easier, and better for consumers. ![]() Ars has summarized those arguments more in-depth here. Much of the opening statements was a rehash of pre-trial briefs that the DOJ and Google filed last week. Dintzer said that most of the DOJ's witnesses will be former and current Google employees and others with a financial interest in Google's conduct. Another key witness will be the co-founder of now-defunct search engine Neeva, Sridhar Ramaswamy, who will testify to barriers to entry that Google still poses today for new search providers. To prove this, the DOJ plans to bring in Hal Varian, who served as Google's chief economist at that time. He told Mehta that the DOJ plans to establish that since 2007, Google has illegally maintained monopoly power in search and advertising markets by focusing on "weaponizing" the "power" of being the default search engine on mobile devices. The DOJ's Kenneth Dintzer, kicked off the proceedings. Mehta alone will decide if Google maintained its role as the world's search leader by competing on its own merits-as Google has claimed-or through anticompetitive conduct-which the DOJ has alleged. Today, US District Judge Amit Mehta heard opening statements in the Department of Justice's antitrust case challenging Google's search dominance. NurPhoto / Contributor | NurPhoto reader comments 164 with
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |